Monday, April 23, 2018

Experts dub doctor’s stem cell technique flawed,

Experts dub doctor’s stem cell technique flawed, fraudulent

TNN | Apr 24, 2018, 05:40 IST
Like India, Sri Lanka’s scientific community doesn’t sanction stem cell therapy as a treatment for neurodevelopmental disorders, but there are no laws prohibiting it.
Alleging that Sion Hospital’s Dr Alok Sharma screened patients in a Colombo hotel after delivering a talk on the subject, the Sri Lanka College of Paediatricians (SLCP) put out a public notice warning people from falling prey to “unproven and exploitative therapies”.


image (5)



Speaking to TOI, SCLP member Dr Samanmali Sumanasena expressed anger at Dr Sharma allegedly marketing the therapy for sums nearing Rs 6.6 lakh. “He or the company (NeuroGen Brain and Spine Institute, Navi Mumbai) had no authority to screen patients in our country without our medi council’s approval,” she said.


Dr Sharma is unfazed by the uproar. “The Lankan community has reacted just the way Indian doctors have over the years. We have MRI and PET scans of 1,200 children to show how stem cells have improved the problematic areas of the brain in autistic children. Nearly a third of these children have gone out of the autism spectrum.”


Explaining the technique, he said he injects stem cells derived from the bone marrow of such children and therefore it’s absolutely safe. But this very mechanism has been dubbed as flawed and even fraudulent by experts. Paediatric neurologist Dr Vrajesh Udani said, “Researchers have zeroed down on 11 genes that are believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of autism. Hence, whatever genetic defects a child has will also be present in the bone marrow. Also, it is unethical to charge patients for an experimental therapy.”


ICMR’s member Dr Geeta Jotwani said its guidelines don’t approve of stem cell use for autism (see graphic). “We framed norms keeping international regulations and research advances in mind,” she said. “The guidelines have a provision for clinical trials as well.” But Dr Sharma implied that conducting a clinical trial would mean depriving some children from stem cell therapy “that works”.

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Srinagar, April 08 (KMS): In occupied Kashmir, medical evidence is mounting to show the devastating effects like blindness of eye injuries caused by metal pellets fired from shotguns by Indian troops on protesters.
The ongoing use of the indiscriminate pellet guns has blinded 1,314 people in occupied Kashmir since 2016 alone. The so-called non-lethal weapon has also caused deaths since it was introduced in the territory during the public uprising of 2010.
A number of empirical studies conducted on Kashmiri victims of the weapon recently published in international scientific journals emphasised the irreversible nature of damage caused to their eyesight. “Pellet injuries in eye causes serious visual decline due to vitreous hemorrhage, cataract and retinal detachment,” states a research paper titled Management of Ocular Pellet Injury published in Global Journal of Medical Research (US).
The study, first since 2016 when mass scale pellet injuries were caused in Kashmir, has been carried out by doctors from an eye hospital in Amritsar on pellet victims visiting from Kashmir for treatment. According to this study, chances of regaining normal vision in a pellet victim eye were minimal.
Another study titled ‘Pellet Gun Fire Injuries in Kashmir Valley – Cause of Ocular Morbidity’ has documented how chances of improvement of vision “remained poor despite development of advanced micro-surgical techniques”. The findings were published in Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.
Researchers found over 50 percent of eyes injured by pellets “had only perception of light” at the time of presentation in the hospital, “reflecting the severe nature of trauma caused by gun pellets”. After multiple surgical interventions, the final corrected vision remained “unchanged” in about 35 percent of victims, researchers found.
“About 50 percent of the cases had final corrected visual acuity less than 6/60” according to the study, meaning the person is able to see something at only 6 meters what someone with standard vision could see from 60 meters away.
An earlier study published in international journal of Medical Science and Public Health found that only 16 percent of people who had been hit by pellets in eyes had vision more than 20/40, meaning “vision half good as normal”.
The rest, 84 percent pellet victims, had blindness of varying degrees. One in three could not see beyond movement of hands in front of their injured eye. An article published in Indian Journal of Medical Ethics in 2016, quoting from various clinical studies on pellet injuries concludes that the weapon was “far from being a benign non-lethal weapon” and has “far-reaching human costs”.
Since the widespread protests sparked by the killing of BurhanWani in July 2016, some 1253 victims of eye injuries caused by pellet guns were treated at SMHS Hospital Srinagar. The use of pellet guns causing “dead eye epidemic” in Kashmir in 2016 caused an international outrage.

Share this:


Saturday, March 31, 2018

Legal implications of hiring non-MBBS doctors in allopathic hospitals

M3 India Newsdesk Mar 29, 2018
In the last part, we covered the story about allopathic hospitals in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, that have been served notice for employing non-MBBS doctors and have flouted the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Dr. T. Jacob John, a noted epidemiologist and a public health expert expresses his opinion on why two very different systems of medicine in India cannot merge to become one wholesome method of clinical practice.
Every system of medicine works for a common cause but, expecting vastly different therapeutic frameworks…

Saturday, February 24, 2018

Artificial Intelligence : Predicting a surgeon’s next move-5 % off its target

Attn: DOCTORS
"The system was able to predict the next action with an average precision of 95%. The system did not make a mistake in more than half of the surgeries, but it did not make a prediction 5%."
M3 India Newsdesk
m3india.in

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Beware of the Lipstick You Use, These Commercial Brands Contain Toxins  that Can Seriously Harm You

Beware of the Lipstick You Use, These Commercial Brands Contain Toxins that Can Seriously Harm You

The perfect shade of lipstick can complete an outfit. We all have a drawer full of our favorite colors for every season, and nothing is better than finishing off an ensemble with a color that suits your complexion. But, some of your favorite brands contain chemicals that can cause hormonal issues and increase your risk of disease. Maybe that drawer-full of colors is not so great after all.

All You Need to Know About Your Lipstick

lipstick
A study, conducted by the EWG, found that more than a quarter of all women in the United States use at least 15 cosmetic products daily, many of which contain known carcinogens that are linked to impaired fertility or developmental harm for a baby in the womb or a child[1].
Understanding where your cosmetics are coming from, and how to avoid the “nasty” ingredients will help you look good, and feel better on a daily basis.

How Lipstick is Made

Ever wondered how it’s actually made or what goes inside? Here’s a quick recap of the most common lipstick manufacturing procedure:
  1. Pigment milling – the desired pigment, or combination of pigments, are mixed together, joined by oil and then ground up into tiny particles. This beginning stage of the process is where the toxic chemicals are combined in order to create the product that you know as lipstick.
  2. Combination of pigment phase into base wax – the ingredients are mixed in a steam-jacketed kettle equipped with a propeller agitator. After mixing, the liquid is then ground again
  3. Molding – molding happens at specific temperatures to eliminate unwanted products of fast-cooling. The lipstick is heated to 80 C and poured into vertical split molds that are kept at a temperature of 35 C
  4. Cooling and Flaming – the resulting lipstick is cooled and extracted from the molds to prepare for flaming, which is the passing of the lipstick over several open flames to melt small layers of gloss (which contains toxic chemicals) around the lipstick. Flaming protects the lipstick from outside air and influences[2]. 

The Ingredients to Avoid in Cosmetics

The law doesn’t require FDA approval before a cosmetic product goes on the market, with the exception of color additives[5]. That means that there are many products in your local pharmacy or supermarket that may contain chemicals that are harmful.
The EWG has created a hazard rating system, with 10 being high toxicity and 1 being mild toxicity. This rating system helps us to see how unsafe the products that we are putting on our skin actually are.
  1. Metals (Lead)

Advertisement
Hazard Level: 10
At this point in time, we all know that metals, especially lead, can be very harmful to us. Despite this, they are still found in commercial lipsticks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration detected lead in 400 brands of lipstick tested by the agency[4].
“There is no safe level of lead exposure. The biggest concern is for pregnant women – lead is a potent neurotoxin and the fetus and very young children are most at risk. Some companies make lead-free lipsticks, and we think all companies should.”[4] says Jane Houlihan, senior VP for research at Environmental Working Group.

2. Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing products

Hazard Level: 10
Formaldehyde is used as a preserving agent in many cosmetic products. The International Agency for Research on Carcinogens has classified it as a ‘carcinogen to humans’. Formaldehyde can cause toxicity to the internal organs and increases the risk of cancer.
Currently, there is no restriction on levels of formaldehyde allowed in products, no requirement to test products that contain it, and no obligation to notify consumers of its presence[6].

3. Retinyl Acetate (Vitamin A Acetate)

Hazard Level: 9
Advertisement
While getting your vitamins is usually considered a good thing, with this ingredient it is not. Retinyl Acetate is a synthetic vitamin A ingredient with a high developmental and reproductive toxicity. Pregnant women should not be exposed to this product, as it can have serious effects on the mother and baby[7].

4. Fragrance

Hazard Level: 8
The word ‘fragrance’ or ‘perfume’ represents an undisclosed mixture of various scent chemicals. The fragrance has been linked to allergies, dermatitis, respiratory distress, and potential effects on the reproductive system[8].

5. Benzyl Benzoate

Hazard Level: 6
Benzyl benzoate is used as a solvent and preservative. It is associated with allergies and dermatitis[9].

Lipstick Brands to Avoid 

The following are all common commercial brands that you may have heard of, or maybe even have in your makeup drawer. They are all listed on the EWG as containing carcinogenic properties.
  1. Maybelline Color Sensational
  2. L’Oreal Colour Riche
  3. CoverGirl Queen Collection Vibrant Hues
  4. NARS Semi-Matte
  5. L’Oreal Intensely Moisturizing Lipcolor
  6. Revlon Matte
  7. CoverGirl Continuous Color
  8. Stargazer Lipstick
  9. Sonia Kashuk Luxury Lip Color
  10. Avon Beyond Color

The Lipstick You Should Wear Instead

Advertisement
Although some of the big cosmetic brands may be a no-no when it comes to safety, there is a way that you can get your lips to look full and bright using much safer products. There are a number of natural lipstick companies that are committed to providing you with the best products for you, that also look great.
Mineral Fusion Lipstick 
This fabulous lipstick brand is natural and smooth. You won’t have a problem finding the perfect color to match your outfit because it comes in a number of beautiful shades.
ZAO Organic Makeup 
If you like a matte-finish look in your lipstick, try ZAO’s organic lipstick as a safe alternative to the commercial brands on the market. We love this product because it comes in a number of stunning shades and a beautiful exterior design.
Earthlab Cosmetics – Vegan Lip Stick Cheeky
If you’re looking for a toxin-free lip liner than this product is for you. This product is also completely vegan, so you can be happy knowing that no animals were harmed in the curation of this product.
Alba Botanica – Hawaiian Clear Lip Gloss Coconut Cream 
If you prefer a simple look, this clear lip gloss may be the best option for you. It’s safe to wear, feels smooth on the lips, and has a wonderful scent without adding chemicals and toxins.
PureFormulas – Dusty Rose Lip Gloss 
If you like having a simple and nourishing product to moisturize your lips without the bright colors, try PureFormulas lip gloss. This product is perfect for anyone who enjoys a subtle look with a little bit of pop.