Monday, April 12, 2021

The Story of One Dose

 

covid-19

The Story of One Dose

Inside the sprawling operational puzzle of bringing the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine to the public.

Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer/Shutterstock / M-Foto

This article was featured in One Great Story, New York’s reading recommendation newsletter. Sign up here to get it nightly.

As an object, it’s not much: an inch and a half of glass with a stopper and some liquid inside. But a thimbleful of the stuff has amazing power — the ability to liberate us from our yearlong collective trauma. The fact that it’s available, scarcely a year after the start of a pandemic, is both an industrial miracle and a freakish stroke of luck; a decade ago, technology did not exist that could bring vaccines so quickly to the public’s arms.

Pfizer and Moderna crossed the finish line first, neck and neck, in December. The third and most recently approved vaccine was from Johnson & Johnson. The J&J vaccine holds some crucial advantages: Only one dose is required rather than two, and while the other approved vaccines expire 30 days after thawing, Johnson & Johnson’s lasts three months, making it easier to distribute in countries that lack an advanced cold chain. The story of the vaccine’s path from development to mass distribution is a lesson in the power of the global capitalist system — the network of corporations and supply chains that, though it can suffocate and disempower us as individuals, can also summon forth immense material and intellectual resources and deploy them for the greater good.

From the start, J&J struggled to catch a break. The pharmaceutical giant played it safe during development and lost crucial time, failed to get FDA approval for parts of its U.S. production chain, missed several delivery targets, and wound up with a vaccine that underperformed its rivals in clinical trials. Then, another obstacle: Last week, the New York Times revealed that the new batch J&J had pledged would be delayed even further, after a mix-up at a subcontractor’s production facility ruined 15 million doses. The Biden administration has since directed J&J to take over every aspect of vaccine production at the plant.

The setback was significant, but not fatal. The facility where the mix-up occurred was part of a production process that relies on a precise orchestration of timing, engineering, and logistical expertise across multiple continents, which makes it vulnerable to bad luck and human error. But the system is also resilient: When the batch of J&J doses was compromised, alternative supply lines were available to compensate for the failure. Here is how that entire tempestuous journey unfolded — the breakthroughs, the setbacks, and the way the pieces came together to bring vaccines to millions of arms.

1.

Sequencing

Photo: IMAGE POINT FR/NIH/NIAID/BSIP/Un

On the afternoon of January 3, 2020, a box arrived at the laboratory of the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, a complex 30 miles southwest of the city center. The box contained swabs taken from a patient in Wuhan who had fallen ill with a new kind of pneumonia. Worried about how dangerous the new pathogen might turn out to be, the Chinese government had banned medical researchers from publishing any information about it. China had experienced public-health scares before: Between 2002 and 2004, a deadly and highly infectious virus called SARS had spread through the country. It was in response to SARS that the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center had been built.

Zhang Yongzhen, the laboratory’s leader, was a specialist in assessing new viruses. Over the next 40 hours, his team painstakingly broke the genetic code of the new pathogen into its sequence of nucleotide base pairs — essentially decoding the software that the virus plugged into its host to make copies of itself. The sequence would tell researchers exactly how it worked so that they could figure out how to thwart it.

At 2 a.m. on January 5, according to a profile in Nature, one of Zhang’s team members gave him bad news: The virus was a close relative of SARS. Though little was yet known about how the disease progressed or how it was transmitted, the potential for rapid spread and widespread death was real.

On the morning of Saturday, January 11, Zhang was on a plane about to take off for Beijing when he got a call from Edward Holmes, a virologist from the University of Sydney. Holmes, a longtime colleague of Zhang’s, knew that he had sequenced the virus’s genome. Holmes impressed upon his colleague the importance of publishing the information. Zhang asked for time to think. If the new disease was as contagious as SARS, it could spread beyond China and put the whole world at risk. But there was a more immediate hazard: the danger of angering Chinese authorities. An airline attendant appeared and told Zhang that the flight was about to take off. He had to decide. “Okay,” Zhang said. Holmes could release the sequence data.

2.

Planning

Photo: Johnson & Johnson

In Boston, on the other side of the international dateline, it was still Friday, January 10. Dan Barouch, a virologist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, was hosting an off-site meeting with his lab at the Boston Museum of Science, in a room that enjoyed a view of the Charles River. Barouch and his team had gathered to plan for the year ahead, but everyone was discussing the news from China, where the first death linked to a new form of pneumonia had just been announced. “It had all the hallmarks of a virus that we thought might have pandemic potential,” Barouch recalls.

In some ways, this was the moment Barouch had been preparing for. For the last decade and a half, he and his team had been developing a “vector” — a way to sneak part of a pathogen’s genetic code into human cells. Once there, it would trigger the cells to create pieces of the pathogen for the body’s immune system to identify. Their vector was a variant of an adenovirus, a bug that causes the common cold. Called Ad26, it had had several of its genes removed so that, while it was able to insert itself into human cells, it couldn’t reproduce and make a person sick. But it could still merge with the human host cell and bring with it the pathogen DNA needed to cue the immune system. This approach could theoretically work with almost any infectious agent — Barouch’s team had already used Ad26 to make vaccines for HIV, tuberculosis, and Zika. Pfizer and Moderna would follow a similar technique using mRNA; by using DNA, a more stable nucleic acid, Barouch & Co. were crafting a vaccine that could be injected in one dose.

It was Friday evening, Boston time, when Zhang’s data hit the internet. Zhang’s lab had decoded the virus into letters symbolizing the four base pairs that make up its genetic code: A, C, G, and T. In effect, Zhang and his team had compressed a living thing into pure information. By uploading it, they had transformed it again, into a string of ones and zeros split up into packets that bounced around the fiber-optic nodes of the internet. Barouch and his team went to work. On Monday, they began translating Zhang’s digital data back into nucleotide sequences, which, in turn, could be converted back into an actual virus. It was as though pieces of the coronavirus had teleported through the web.

Immediately, Barouch saw the best strategy. He noticed that the virus contained a spike protein — a piece that sticks out like the rubber hair on a Koosh ball, which an antibody in the human bloodstream would be most likely to recognize. From the genome, Barouch could tell which stretch of DNA coded for it. To make the vaccine, this would be the sequence to pack into the Ad26 vector. The question was what exactly the message should contain: the whole spike protein sequence or just part? Should the scientists include a preamble, or other sections that might help get the message across to the immune system? The decision could mean the difference between an efficacious vaccine and a useless one.

Meanwhile, the disease was spreading rapidly in China and cases were starting to appear internationally. Barouch contacted Johan Van Hoof, the head of vaccine development at Janssen Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson with R&D centers in Leiden, the Netherlands. They had worked together on vaccine development for more than a decade. “Johann, this is looking bad,” Barouch told him. “I think we need to make a vaccine.”

“Absolutely,” Van Hoof said. “We do.”

3.

Assembling

Photo: Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe

The labs in Boston and Leiden began working in parallel, staying in touch with daily phone calls. They started by creating a dozen different lengths of DNA and injecting them directly into mice to see which triggered the most vigorous immune response. They then winnowed the list to seven candidates, packed them into the Ad26 vector, and tested the variants on Rhesus monkeys. It was a bit like A/B testing of different versions of an Internet ad: Each version of the DNA snippet would cause the body’s cells to produce a different protein, which, in turn, would have a different effect on the immune system. They wanted to make sure they chose the most powerful one.

On February 11, the worldwide death toll passed 1,100, with more than 44,000 cases reported in China and several other countries. Health officials at last gave the disease a name: COVID-19. In those crucial early months, every day in the lab presented an existential battle between quality and speed. If Barouch and Van Hoof made a best guess at the right sequence and put it straight into the vector, they could roll out the vaccine sooner and save countless lives — the approach that Moderna and AstraZeneca chose. But this could result in an inferior vaccine that would allow more people to die. In the end, the scientists decided to take a few months to test multiple versions on animals first, then advance the most effective one to human testing.

They ran the test on 52 animals. Some of the variants were given to four animals, others to six. The researchers then exposed all the test animals to COVID. Compared to control animals, the monkeys that received versions of the vaccine showed little viral replication. But monkeys that received a variant called S.PP showed almost no sign of infection at all. On March 30, 2020, it was this variant that Janssen announced as its vaccine candidate. It was called Ad26.COV2.S.

To ensure that the Ad26.COV2.S would be safe and effective for humans, the company would need to test it — first on a few hundred people, then on tens of thousands. It normally takes years to conduct a full slate of tests, get results, and design a follow-up round. Instead, Van Hoof’s team began running steps in parallel. As soon as it could see what direction the animal tests were going, the lab started to produce vaccine material for human trials — a decision that would move the trial start date up from September to July. And, in April, even before the results of the clinical trial came in, Johnson & Johnson began making plans to manufacture and package the vaccine at scale, so that mass quantities would be ready by the time the human tests came back. If the results were good, J&J could quickly start putting needles in arms. If not, the vaccines would get chucked in the trash, and billions of dollars spent on research and development would go up in smoke.

Months later, Johnson & Johnson learned it had made the right call. Clinical-trial results showed the vaccine worked and was safe, and it received a green light from the FDA in February 2021.

4.

Manufacturing Substance

Photo: Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post

Johnson & Johnson makes a wide variety of medications, but it had never fulfilled an order as large as the coronavirus vaccine, a drug that 7.8 billion people — 331 million in the U.S. alone — needed right away. By spring, the Trump administration was lobbing contracts at vaccine-makers: $483 million to Moderna, $456 million to Johnson & Johnson, $30 million to Sanofi, then $1.2 billion to AstraZeneca, and $1.95 billion to Pfizer. Johnson & Johnson promised 100 million doses, but even that was way beyond its capabilities. So to augment production from Janssen’s own facility in Leiden, it signed up partners around the world to produce its as-yet-unproven vaccine, including, in the U.S., a company called Emergent BioSolutions.

Founded in 1998 to produce anthrax vaccine as a defense against terror attacks, Emergent had, over the years, received hundreds of millions of dollars to provide doses for the U.S. government’s strategic stockpile. When the threat came in the form of a pandemic, it was tasked, instead, with manufacturing millions of doses of Ad26.COV2.S. But growing Ad26 viral vectors wasn’t a straightforward process. To turn the original virus into a harmless vaccine, researchers had deleted genes the virus needs for replication; in order to make copies of itself, the Ad26.COV2.S vector required a special environment. The solution was to insert the virus’s missing genes into a unique human-cell line that had originated in the eye of a human fetus aborted in the mid-1980s. This genetically modified cell line was named PER.C6. Unlike normal human cells, which can multiply only so many times before dying, these cells are immortal; as long as they’re fed the right nutrients and kept at the right temperature, they can grow forever. Because PER.C6 contained the genes that Ad26 needed to reproduce, it held the key to growing the viral vectors.

Last fall, in an office park in East Baltimore, Emergent technicians added the contents of a cell-culture bag to a ceiling-high tank holding a single-use bioreactor. The bioreactor was filled with a 1,000-liter solution of sugars, proteins, and other nutrients. Inside the warm bath, cells began to multiply.

Once the PER.C6 cells grew to the right volume, workers added several liters of Ad26.COV2.S seed containing millions of vector particles. Inside the bioreactor was a genetically engineered paradise. The adenovirus particles latched onto the exterior of PER.C6 cells and injected them with their DNA. Once inside, the genetic material caused the cells to start manufacturing the components that make up the virus particle, until the hosts were so stuffed with tiny self-assembled machines that they burst, spewing out a conquering robot army into the broth. After a week, the PER.C6 cells were either hijacked or dead, and the tank contained quadrillions of virus particles, enough for millions of doses. Waste and cell fragments got filtered out, and what was left was concentrated, then frozen at 94 degrees below zero. The resulting material is known as vaccine substance.

For months, this process took place again and again in Baltimore and in the Netherlands. But by early 2021, the millions of units of vaccine substance produced at Emergent still weren’t allowed to leave the plant. Like Moderna and Pfizer, J&J, under the pressures of a global crisis, had begun activating parts of its supply chain before all of them had received the official green light, and the FDA had not yet inspected and approved the Baltimore facility, which had, in recent years, received a string of citations for quality-control issues.

Then, in late February, disaster struck. Emergent accidentally mixed Johnson & Johnson vaccine ingredients with those of AstraZeneca’s, destroying 15 million doses and further delaying the facility’s FDA approval and the delivery of more vaccines. The plant had caught the error and quarantined the incorrect doses, and, in the meantime, a new supply line was starting to get under way — in March, President Biden announced that the pharmaceutical giant Merck, which had abandoned its own vaccine initiative, would convert and upgrade its facilities to help manufacture more J&J doses. But until it could sort out the mess, Johnson & Johnson was forced to rely on vaccine substance produced at Janssen’s plant in Leiden.

5.

Creating Product

Photo: Catalent Pharma Solutions/Youtube

After the vaccine substance is manufactured and approved, it then has to go to a “finish and fill” facility, where the deep-frozen concentrate will get turned into stuff that can actually be injected into a person. Last year, J&J scrambled to contract with Catalent Biologics, an international pharmaceutical processing company that could quickly expand its plant in Bloomington, Indiana. In June, Catalent was also tapped to finish-and-fill the Moderna vaccine.

Inside a space that, a year ago, was an empty warehouse, gleaming panoplies of stainless-steel arms and wheels whir. Behind aseptic barriers, the vaccine substance is thawed, blended with substances like 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (to improve its solubility) and Polysorbate 80 (a stabilizer often used in food and cosmetics), then fed into a vial-filling assembly line. Sterilized vials move by conveyor belt into a filling station where a multipronged needle bobs up and down, squirting ten full at a time.

There is no margin for error. A single vial that gets chipped or cracked could ruin an entire production run. Optimizing this kind of process is a never-ending task, with chemists and engineers tuning and tweaking at the nano level. The material sciences company Corning, for instance, recently figured out how to prevent glass from flaking off vials by switching from borosilicate to aluminosilicate, a substance it calls Valor Glass.

Each newly filled vial contains five doses — about a quarter-trillion adenovirus particles in three milliliters of liquid. A printer lays an alphanumeric code around the vial, then a robotic packing machine places ten vials in a box, at a rate of 600 vials a minute. During the filling process, no human hand has intervened once. As with Emergent, Catalent’s new facility needed an FDA signoff before the material it produces could be released to the public — on March 23, 2021, that approval finally arrived. Five days later, the Bloomington plant began shipping out J&J vials, which could then join the 6 million finished vaccines that had been sent to the U.S. from J&J’s Netherlands factory.

6.

Distribution

Photo: McKesson

Late last year, a billboard appeared along the highway in Shepherdsville, Kentucky, a rural town 20 miles south of Louisville. “NOW HIRING,” it said. “Material Handlers Get Paid Up to $20.12 Per Hour.” The jobs were posted by McKesson, a large pharmaceutical-distribution company that had been contracted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to package and dispatch all COVID-19 vaccines, except for Pfizer’s. In late 2020, the company completed construction on its brand-new Shepherdsville facility, a squat, quarter-mile-long million-square-foot warehouse, and it needed to hire more than 500 workers.

In the race to create and distribute the vaccine, McKesson’s role may first appear as mundane as that of any fulfillment center: It’s tasked with counting out the correct number of ten vial-size boxes for each site (900 vaccine doses to a high school in Kalamazoo, Michigan, say, or 300 to a health center in Athens, Georgia) and packaging them into cartons for shipment. But it’s the scale of the operation that’s key — a huge portion of America’s vaccine production will, at one point, need to go through McKesson. Its Shepherdsville hub is one of the company’s four facilities shipping COVID vaccine doses; to construct the storage racks alone required at least 3.7 million pounds of steel, more than a quarter of the metal frame used to construct the Eiffel Tower.

Photo: McKesson

Inside a hangar-like room hung with American flags, workers load the boxes of J&J vaccines into KoolTemp EPS coolers, adding frozen gel packs and a monitoring device that logs the temperature and triggers a warning if it gets too high or low. To prevent that from happening, workers are allotted 30 minutes to place the coolers into cartons. (In another section of the facility, Moderna doses, which must be maintained at a lower temperature, are packed inside a freezer by workers wearing parkas and insulated boots.) McKesson workers are also tasked with assembling the kits that contain everything a vaccination center needs to administer the vaccines: alcohol pads, face shields, surgical masks, and needles and syringes.

Less than two days after arriving at the McKesson warehouse, the vaccine is off on the next leg of its journey.

7.

Shipping

Photo: UPS

A UPS semi pulls up to the loading dock, and workers place the KoolTemp cartons into the trailer. The truck swings onto the onramp to I-65 North and drives the 20 miles to UPS Worldport, a 5.2-million-square-foot intermodal shipping hub located on the grounds of Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport. There, the boxes are unloaded, scanned, and sorted through a 155-mile-long system of conveyor belts.

Until now, each stage of the vaccine-making process has required some kind of scientific or logistical coup: the compression of a years-long process into a matter of weeks, the creation of a new technology, the rapid alteration of a physical landscape. But when it came time to move those millions of doses to their final destinations, it took barely any extra effort for UPS and FedEx to activate their networks. After all, among the 20 million packages delivered daily, thousands of vaccine shipments were a rounding error.

In 2019, UPS introduced a service for health-care customers that allows them to more precisely track shipments of medicines, samples, and vaccines. Each carton is affixed with a tag that allows sensors to track its location, and the data gets transmitted to the UPS health-care command center inside Worldport, a room with four large-screen monitors on the wall displaying national weather and UPS flights in transit. When bad weather before Christmas meant that a vaccine shipment’s destination was closed, for instance, the health-care command center got on the phone and arranged to have it redirected.

Photo: Timothy D. Easley/POOL/AFP

As the cartons wend their way through the maze of conveyor belts, scanners read the label on each and shunt it to the appropriate outbound loading station. Shortly before midnight, planes start arriving at the Louisville airport at the rate of about one a minute, carrying inbound packages; those packages get sorted at the rate of 115 every second, then loaded back onto planes heading for their final destination.

Within 15 minutes of its unloading at Worldport, a box slides down a chute to the outbound station. A worker scans it and checks all six sides for damage, then loads it into an airfreight shipping container bound for New York. Around 4 a.m., the pilot takes off.

8.

Administration

Photo: Johnny Milano/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Later that morning, the box arrives at the loading dock of a vaccination site. This final leg of the vaccine’s journey — delivering doses to a place where they can be put into people’s arms — is the simplest in concept, but was, for a long time, the most vexing. In the weeks after the first vaccines were approved and shipped, New York State proved ill-prepared to deliver its allocated doses. By early January, some vaccination sites had used less than 20 percent of the doses they’d been sent.

Similar problems played out across the country. Despite having lavished billions on producing vaccines, the Trump administration had largely ignored the question of distribution and administration, leaving the matter to states and offering little support. Entire organizational structures had to be built on the fly using whatever labor happened to be available. In New York City, the effort leaned heavily on the Medical Reserve Corps, a group of more than 15,000 volunteers who stand by to help out in crises. By the end of January, the system was running smoothly enough that the vaccination centers were efficiently doling out what they’d received.

Photo: Angus Mordant/Bloomberg via Getty Images

When it’s your turn, you roll up your sleeve. The nurse chooses a needle based on the heft of your arm — an inch and a half for larger people, an inch otherwise — and pushes the tip into the rubber gasket atop the vial containing your dose. She slips the needle into your muscle. Inside your arm, 50 billion genetically engineered nanoscale robot assassins, carrying genetic payloads downloaded from the internet and bred in a soup of immortal human-eye cells, begin prying their way through your cells’ defenses.

One Great Story: A Nightly Newsletter for the Best of New York

Sunday, April 11, 2021

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic ...

by R Vaishya · 2020 · Cited by 292The major applications of this AI are for early detection and diagnosis of the infection. •. AI is used for the development of drugs and vaccines, and the reduction of ... important role to detect the cluster of cases and to predict where this virus will ...
26-Mar-2021 — X-rays, first used clinically in the late 1890s, could be a leading-edge ... methods, to detect COVID-19 in chest X-rays with 95.6 to 98.5% accuracy.
by AS Adly · 2020 · Cited by 23Moreover, the adoption of other approaches, including use of AI for COVID-19 ... quantification, and detection of COVID-19 can assist in differentiating patients ...
March 20, 2020 — An artificial intelligence deep learning model can accurately detect COVID-19 and differentiate it from community acquired pneumonia and ...














 

Wednesday, March 31, 2021

 

5 March — T cells might provide rescue from rampant coronavirus variants

Emerging coronavirus variants do not seem to elude important immune-system players called T cells, laboratory studies suggest.

Some recently discovered SARS-CoV-2 variants can partially evade antibodies generated in response to vaccination and previous infection,raising fears that vaccines will be less effective against the variants than against the original strain of the virus. Alessandro Sette and Alba Grifoni at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology in California and their colleagues looked at whether these variants’ mutations might also help them to evade T cells — a component of the immune system that is particularly important for reducing the severity of infectious diseases (A. Tarke et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/gh6tkp; 2021).

The team collected T cells from volunteers who had either recovered from infection with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain or had received an mRNA coronavirus vaccine. The researchers then tested the cells’ ability to recognize protein snippets from four emerging variants, including the B.1.351 variant first identified in South Africa.

Most of the volunteers’ T cells recognized all four variants, thanks to viral protein snippets that were unaffected by the variants’ mutations. The results suggest that T cells could target these variants.

can Hepes Zoster antibodies attenuate corona virus symptoms?

 I am near 80 ;no comorbidity problem yet during this corona pandemic season

[the simultaneous presence of two or more diseases or medical conditions in a patient;

age and comorbidity may be risk factors for poor outcome"]

I had chickenpox[VARICELLA] IN 1970-got cured without any problem

 varicella vaccine:-

Varicella - CDC

https://www.cdc.gov › pinkbook › downloads › v...
PDF
A live, attenuated varicella vaccine was developed in Japan in the 1970s. The vaccine virus was developed from virus isolated by Michiaki Takahashi from vesicular fluid from an otherwise healthy child with varicella disease.
Chickenpox vaccine became available in the United States in 1995. Each year, more than 3.5 million cases of chickenpox, 9,000 hospitalizations, and 100 deaths ...

December 2020:-

i had a relapse of the varicella virus in the form of shingles/or herpeszoster

it was diagnosed and cleared out with antiviral treatment{
Acyclovir (Sitavig, Zovirax) }

AFTER 1 MONTH IN JANUARY  2021 I HAD A VERY MILD CORONA INFECTION WITH NO TYPICAL SYMPTOMS OF CORONA LIKE FEVER;COUGH ETC

IN FACT IHAD NO SYMPTOM  TO SUSPECT I HAD CORONA EXCEPT LOW BACK PAIN WHICH I THOUGHTT MAY BE DUE TO LONG AND WRONG SITTING IN FRONT OF COMPUTER; AND TIREDNESS

JUST OUT OF CURIOsITY I DID A RT pcr test which proved i had corona infection

I HAD HOME QUARANTINE AND NORMAL FOOD AND LIFE FOR 10 DAYS WITH CORONA RESTRICTIONS AND I AM OK -THOUGH I HAVE TO WAIT FOR 3 MONTHS TO GET A VACCINE BECAUSE I AM SUPPOSED TO HAVE ENOUGH ANTI BODY AND RESISTANCE AFTER COVID-THOUGH NOBODY KNOWS WHETHER SUCH ANTIBODIES LAST FOR 3 MONTHS OR MORE

NOW THE BIG QUESTION?

CAN HERPES ZOSTER INFECTION WILL GIVE HUMANS ENOUGH ANTIBODIES AND RESISTANCE TO CORONA 
BECAUSE I AM SURE FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE HERPES ZOSTER INFECTION CAN GIVE RESISTANCE TO CORONA
SO THE NEXT QUESTION:- CAN ANTI HERPES ZOSTER VACCINE

Zostavax is an FDA licensed vaccine that helps to reduce the risk of getting herpes zoster (shingles) in individuals 50 years of age and older.19-Oct-2018

AFTER VERIFICATION IF FOUND USEFUL CAN BE USED


Friday, March 26, 2021

 

Roman medicine: 6 ways people stayed healthy in ancient Rome

“Baths, wine and sex corrupt our bodies, but baths, wine and sex make life worth living”. This inscription – from the tomb of a Roman merchant of Ephesus, Tiberius Claudius Secundus – indicates that, like us, the Romans sought a sensible balance between an enjoyable existence and a healthy one. Dr Nick Summerton shares six tips from ancient Rome for living a healthy life…

Second century relief portraying a Roman ophthalmologist examining a patient. (Photo By DEA / A. DAGLI ORTI/De Agostini via Getty Images)

They’re known for their roads, military strategy and inventing the book – but what advice might our Roman forebears issue on the subject of staying healthy? Dr Nick Summerton shares six Roman medicine practices…

1

Take responsibility

The Romans attached great importance to preserving health

The second-century physician Galen emphasised that it was a person’s responsibility to take care of their bodies, writing that people must “take it upon [them]selves to preserve health” by following a particular lifestyle (or `hygiene`). He highlighted the importance of taking fresh air and getting enough sleep, in addition to carefully considering diet, exercise and hydration. Galen certainly led by example, writing: “After I reached the age of twenty-eight, having persuaded myself that there is an art of hygiene, I followed its precepts for the rest of my life and was never sick with any disease apart from the occasional fever.”

It was seen as extremely important to tailor the ‘hygienic approach’ to individuals, ensuring that a person was not under-or over-emphasising any specific element as part of their health plan. As Galen explained: “For just as it is impossible for cobblers to use one last for all people, so too it is impossible for doctors to use one plan of life that is beneficial to all. Because of this, then, they say it is most healthy for some to exercise sufficiently every day, whereas for others, there is nothing to prevent them passing their lives wholly in idleness. Also, for some it seems to be most healthy to bathe, whereas for others it does not.”

What were the four humours?

The Romans believed that all matter within the universe – including human bodies – was made from four elemental substances (fire, air, water and earth) and four elemental qualities associated with them (hot, cold, wet and dry). It was thought that the human body contained four corresponding humours – blood (hot and wet); yellow bile (hot and dry); black bile (cold and dry); and phlegm (cold and wet). These four humours needed to be in the correct amounts and strengths for a body to be healthy. The proper blending and balance of the four humours was known as ‘eukrasia’ – whereas imbalance of humours – or `dyskrasia` – led to disease. Illness occurred when there was an imbalance of the four humours in the body. ‘Hygiene’ (which was used in a slightly different sense to its definition today) was about restoring the normal equilibrium of humours and qualities – thereby preventing disease and preserving health.


2

Eat a healthy diet

Food and fresh air were key to good health

Much like today, a healthy diet was considered part of a balanced health plan. Recent evidence based on an examination of material from several Roman sewers has shed some light on the foodstuffs being consumed by the average Roman. By modern standards, the diet of the population in Herculaneum at the time of the eruption of Vesuvius was extremely healthy and mineral rich, containing high levels of seafood and vegetable protein. (In fact, the residents of Herculaneum probably ate considerably more fish than are consumed by the area’s population today!)

Gardens were also popular with the Romans and, aside from cultivating plants and vegetables, had a much broader role in enhancing wellbeing. In one of his letters, Pliny the Younger described walks along tree-lined pathways and avenues edged by box hedges at his villa in Tuscany. He also commented on the wholesome air with splendid views, cool breezes and sweet aromas.

3

Choose your doctor carefully

The Romans were wary of placing too much trust in physicians

The Roman historian Pliny the Elder cautioned his fellow citizens about trusting the medical profession – especially the Greeks: “Physicians acquire their knowledge from our dangers, making experiments at the cost of our lives. Only a physician can commit homicide with complete impunity.”

Despite numerous references to ‘physicians’ across the Roman empire, it is often unclear what led to an individual acquiring the title ‘doctor’. There were no examinations, no diplomas, no degrees and no professional licensing procedures in the Roman world; a doctor was simply an individual who claimed the title and carried out treatment for some type of remuneration.

Also, for the Romans, the concept of having a personal professional physician was an anathema. It was at odds with the Roman values of self-sufficiency and looking after your own. On Roman farms the head of the household (pater familias) assumed the role of chief healer with responsibility for the health of his family and any estate workers. As the scholar and agriculturalist Varro explained: “There are two divisions […] in the treatment of human beings: in the one case the physician should be called in, while in the other even an attentive herdsman is competent to give the treatment.”

An array of ancient Roman surgical instruments at the British Museum, c1910. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)
An array of ancient Roman surgical instruments at the British Museum, c1910. (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

The exact circumstances when the advice of a physician might be sought are somewhat vague. However one of the writing tablets discovered at Vindolanda, a Roman auxiliary fort just south of Hadrian’s Wall, suggests that the women of military families were expected to deal with the day-to-day health problems that arose in their households. They kept a selection of medicines on hand for this purpose. Paterna, the wife of the garrison prefect at Vindolanda, supplied medicine to her sister, Lepidina: “I shall supply you with two remedies”, she wrote in a letter to her – one of which was for fever.

Unfortunately, for the Roman patient, there were no lists of approved practitioners that could be checked for those wishing to enlist the help of a physician. To get an insight into a doctor’s abilities (and perhaps for entertainment, too), it was not unusual to attend public displays of anatomical skills or to watch medical competitions. In addition, Roman medicine was often practised in public with many folk clustering around the bed of a sick individual, critically scrutinising the care being proffered. Galen outlined how strangers even joined in on house visits: “Boethus seized me and took me along home to see the boy. People who met us in the street, of whom you were one, also came.”

4

Look after your eyes

Eye problems were a particular concern for Romans

To the Romans the eyes were a privileged body part, and the transition point between the soul and the outside world. Several representations of eyes – in gold, bronze and plaster – have been found at Wroxeter in Shropshire. Such religious votive objects were left in anticipation of a cure or as an offering of gratitude.

Inadequate hygiene and dusty roads would have contributed to the large numbers of individuals with eye problems. A military strength report of the First Cohort of Tungrians from Vindolanda specifically categorises the 31 soldiers signed off as unfit into three distinct groups: aegri (sick  – 15); volnerati (wounded – 6); and lippientes (eye troubles – 10).

Two dozen oculist (or collyrium) stamps have been discovered in Britain – including two at Wroxeter. These small green stones were used for impressing the name of the maker as well as the nature and purpose of an eye treatment onto a hardened block of medication (collyrium). The stamps usually consist of small thin square blocks, generally with an inscription on each of the four edges. In a few instances the stone is oblong with two inscribed sides and in one from Wroxeter, it is circular. The letters are cut in intaglio form and written from right to left so that when stamped on the collyrium they make an impression that reads from left to right.

Roman doctor inspecting eye of a woman. (Photo by CM Dixon/Heritage Images/Getty Images)
“Eye problems were a particular concern for Romans,” writes Nick Summerton. This relief shows a Roman physician inspecting the eye of a woman. (Photo by CM Dixon/Heritage Images/Getty Images)

In his De Medicina, the first-century writer Celsus devoted a whole chapter to eye care and provided a very clear description of cataract surgery:

“He is to be seated opposite the surgeon in a light room, facing the light, while the surgeon sits on a slightly higher seat; the assistant from behind holds the head so that the patient does not move: for vision can be destroyed permanently by a slight movement…

“Thereupon a needle is to be taken pointed enough to penetrate, yet not too fine, and this is to be inserted straight through the two outer tunics at a spot intermediate between the pupil of the eye and the angle adjacent to the temple, away from the middle of the cataract, in such a way that no vein is wounded.

“The needle should not be, however, entered timidly… When the [correct] spot is reached, the needle is to be sloped…..and should gently rotate there and little by little guide it [ie, the lens with the cataract] below the region of the pupil.”

Eye couching needles to undertake the procedure have been found at Carlisle and Piddington Roman Villa, Northamptonshire.

5

Secure expert wound care

The survival rate of Roman soldiers after battle was better than that of their opponents

Slashing and cutting wounds from long swords would have been particularly common injuries for Roman soldiers battling across Britain. Other weapons used by the local tribes included spears, knives, axes, stone sling shot and, less commonly, arrows. The consequences for some unfortunate Roman soldiers were fractures, head and eye injuries – in addition to penetrating abdominal or chest wounds.

All cuts and abrasions needed cleaning and dressing: some others required stitching too. Occasionally, more complicated surgery was necessary to remove bone fragments, stop bleeding or to extract spear points.

Traumatic wounds were at particular risk of getting infected and honey dressings were frequently used by the Romans. The military physician Dioscorides wrote that “honey is cleansing, opens pores, and draws out fluids. Boiled and applied it heals flesh that stands separated”.

First aid is given to a Roman soldier in this frieze. (Photo by SSPL/Getty Images)
First aid is given to a Roman soldier in this frieze. (Photo by SSPL/Getty Images)

A lot of basic wound care would have been provided by fellow soldiers, some of whom – the capsarii – were trained first aiders. The capsarii were under the control of a doctor with the rank of a centurion, such as Anicius Ingenuus, medicus ordinarius of the first cohort of Tungrians from Housesteads, on Hadrian’s Wall.

The repair of a simple flesh wound was the most performed surgical procedure undertaken by individuals such as Anicius Ingenuus. Basic surgical kits consisting of probes, hooks, forceps, needles, cautery tools and scalpels were readily available, and many items have been discovered in excavations at Roman sites across Britain.

Stitching cuts with a needle and thread was not dissimilar to the approach used today, but if there were any concerns about infection or inflammation the fibulae technique was often preferred. This entailed passing copper-alloy skewers through the wound and then looping threads around them in a figure-of-eight fashion. The Roman medical writer and thinker Celsus wrote that “fibulae leave the wound wider open […] in order that there may be an outlet for any humour collecting within”.

6

Focus on overall wellbeing

To the Romans, physical and mental health were closely linked

Looking after the psyche – or the soul – was viewed as integral to the care of the body and it was a key element of keeping in shape alongside exercise, fresh air, sleep and diet.

Many Romans citizens sought a philosophy of life and one approach popularised by the likes of the emperor Marcus Aurelius was Stoicism. The overriding aim was to replace negative emotions such as grief, anger and anxiety with positive emotions such as joy.

Other individuals, such as the emperor Caracalla, frequented healing sanctuaries. These focused on providing holistic care (including psychological wellbeing) by offering a broad range of treatments, as well as enlisting the assistance of healing deities including Aesculapius.

Across Britain several inscriptions to Aesculapius have been discovered in addition to two healing sanctuaries at Lydney, in Gloucestershire, and Bath, dedicated to Nodens and Sulis Minerva respectively. The site at Lydney has been comprehensively excavated revealing a temple, a guest house, a well-equipped suite of baths and a long narrow building containing many cubicles (abaton).

The abaton was where visitors would have been taken to experience ritual temple sleep and dream healing – termed incubation. During this process priests circulated among the sleepers with serpents or dogs, the curative dreams being augmented by licks from the animals.

At Lydney numerous representations of sacred Irish wolfhounds have been found, in addition to a mosaic decorated with fish and sea monsters bearing the inscription: D M N T FLAVIUS SENILIS PR REL EX STIPIBUS POSSUIT O[PITU]LANTE VICTORINO INTERP[RE]TIANTE (translated as “for the god Mars Nodens, Titus Flavius Senilis, superintendent of the cult, from the offerings had this laid; Victorinus, the interpreter (of dreams), gave his assistance”).

Individuals visiting healing sites would have been subjected to a raft of psychological interventions designed to restore their tranquillity: group therapy, talking therapy, various arts therapies, dream healing; all combined with rest and relaxation. There was also an emphasis on locotherapy – the psychological benefits of locomotion as well as being in a specific place (location). There is evidence for eye care and surgery being undertaken at Lydney too.

Water was also an extremely important element of many sanctuaries and was drunk for its healing properties as well as being used for bathing, hydrotherapy and ritual cleansing. Some sites, such as Bath, were associated with hot springs or waters with specific mineral constituents. At Lydney the iron-rich nature of the waters might have encouraged individuals suffering from anaemia to visit, based on the finding of a votive hand exhibiting koilonychia (spoon-shaped nails), a sign of iron-deficiency.

Nick Summerton is a medical doctor with a longstanding interest in Roman Britain. His fifth book Greco-Roman Medicine and What It Can Teach Us Today will be published later this year by Pen and Sword Books. You can find him on Twitter @YorkshireGP